Business process management programs have seen a great deal of evolution over the past decade and now for 2019, there are more brands brandishing themselves as a one-stop-shop for all company requirements.
What developers, analysts, accountants and managers will eventually reach is a decision between two distinct models dominating the market: Anaplan Solutions vs. Adaptive Insights planning.
Before proceeding with a purchase based on anecdotal evidence or reading a quick online review, it is worthwhile knowing some facts about their pro’s and con’s.
Having a user-friendly interface is a key element when opting for business software programming. The Anaplan vs. Adaptive Insights planning breakdown is interesting in relation to this talking point as the latter offers a wide variety of different customization options. This is ideal for modern organisations or unique practices that need their own style of modeling to be integrated. The data hub for the former also comes highly recommended as it is capable of aggregating data from various points, but it is not quite as user-friendly as the competition.
Integration and Device Connection
Anaplan vs. Adaptive Insights planning should be viewed in relation to what a business already has on site. With the former, it is capable of working with web-based devices, Windows and Mac and because it is an API system, it is flexible to whatever digital software is on hand. The latter is able to work along the same lines as well as iPhone and iPad but because it is not an API model it is limited to Salesforce, NetSuite, QuickBooks, Workday, Sage Intacct and SAP Oracle applications only.
Business Planning and Forecasting Capabilities
The capacity for a management team to sit down and examine what the current landscape of the market is becomes a major asset. Akin to a game of chess where pieces are shifted for a singular purpose, the programming conflict between Anaplan vs. Adaptive Insights planning becomes relatively straightforward. It is the former that manages to offer superior modeling as part of their package and this feature extends to the ability to plan and forecast into the short, medium and long-term future. It will track the cash flow, integrate key variables and outline with clarity what the expectations are in the coming weeks, months and years.
Modest enterprises who want an efficient process of gauging their analytics and running an internal audit will take a very particular view of the Anaplan vs. Adaptive Insights planning dynamic. They will view the latter as superior on this front as automated projections are made without the need for in-depth record keeping. Those brands who are larger in scale and have a more specified means of keeping large stocks of data will prefer the former. If there are instances where oversight is made or there are significant gaps in the information that is stored within the company, they would be wise to opt for what Insights has to offer them.
Quantity of Features and Resources
The final discussion point when weighing up the merits of the Anaplan vs. Adaptive Insights planning programs is to determine which brand can cater to a wider variety of needs. On this count it is the former that issues a diverse customised package that ticks multiple boxes. Adaptive develops their software around a handful of key features to include balance sheet and cash flow to management of the workforce, expenses, capital and revenue, and an analysis of profitability. Yet if the financial element is not enough for a modern business to utilise, Anaplan makes use of model building, in-memory processing, API integration, data synchronisation and an app hub among multiple other tools.
The ultimate choice between Anaplan vs. Adaptive Insights planning programs will come down to the management team by weighing up the pro’s versus the con’s. This becomes a very reflective and subjective task to determine what the scale of the enterprise is, what the industry is shaped like, plans for growth, integration and synchronisation between departments and intellectual property on site to carry out the programming. Once these judgments have been made, the cost of the package itself becomes secondary when understanding the benefits of using the model.